May 18, 2024, 04:02:21 PM

Username
Password

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 19
76  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament August on: August 12, 2010, 07:19:32 PM
sign me in, and my vote for darkmancer's mod
77  Multiplayer Campaign / Dark Omen Conquest / Re: DOE Conquest Chat Room on: August 11, 2010, 01:10:44 AM
well i just came back saw all new topics on forum and my mind is melting Wink ofc sign me up but i will read rules tommorow as of now its too late and everything there seems like blablabla to me ;]

chaos dwarves or kislev
78  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament July on: August 11, 2010, 12:38:46 AM
nice tourney congratz to all who took part in it and of course to the winners ;]
and how cool that i still got yellow name Wink
79  Warhammer Dark Omen Community / Tavern / Re: the future of the avatars for members (?) on: July 20, 2010, 11:28:09 AM
wikurwiorny ? hm i see you guys got real problem with my nick so maybe just call me "Chrzaszcz ze szczebrzeszyna" instead
80  Warhammer Dark Omen / Multiplayer / Re: Funny battles with gabriel on: July 19, 2010, 04:54:40 PM
now i would really like to hear your reactions after our games Smiley
81  Warhammer Dark Omen Community / Tavern / Re: Map pach on: July 19, 2010, 04:53:49 PM
hm maybe you copied "map patch" folder into 1pbat instead of folders like "B1_01" "B1_02" etc ?

btw do you have gameranger account or do you sit in one of hamachi rooms ?
82  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: TOURNAMENT JUNE 2010 Version 2.0 on: July 18, 2010, 02:40:33 PM
other view on the final battle :]

http://youtubedoubler.com/MpwP
83  Warhammer Dark Omen Community / News / Re: Administrator Promotion on: July 17, 2010, 07:13:03 PM
congrats Darkmancer and all people putting their time and effort to make this game better and better Smiley
84  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament or Playtest field on: July 17, 2010, 08:39:52 AM
well i just felt the need to correct his ignorant opinion

and back to the playtests, everything really have been said about it, as its hard to gather people outside of the "official" tournament to make some big test in mini-tournament, so its rather up to playing single players and checking things with them as most of us do. So dont think that something that is proposed in the votings and isn't a default game with some restrictions is automaticly bad
85  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament or Playtest field on: July 16, 2010, 02:32:55 PM
WOW WOW WOW WKUU "kura, abe, contrasnake" pffffffffffff sorry?Huh? tell me where are these "users" "players", man they dont exist, and what do they know about modding? and balancing? :S please, give me a call +54 02245-15-433152 and we talk

and i mean,, what does kura, abe, contrasnake knows about w32edit, do they knew the stats?? and if the tabletop game exists? :S the amount is not the importance, the quality yes Wink (of testers)

well you might belive they dont exist but they were very real when i played with them, and why would they need to know anything about WH32 ? they tried to make most overpowered armies and we played, well at least i test it like that checking for overpowered variants and fixing them

oh and ive never talked, saw, played happyman.. so does this means he doesnt exist ? Smiley
86  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament or Playtest field on: July 16, 2010, 02:12:29 PM
when no logic arguments occur Tongue but yeah love you too Ramiro Smiley and good luck in this month voting
87  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament or Playtest field on: July 16, 2010, 02:04:09 PM
ok dont know if you are joking or are you for real but this post is just a total bs

well, in my opinion is that there are ruleset that are more tested than others, and for reach a "tested ruleset" you have to take the work of find  players to play and test, and then makea softly balance... this june tournament i didnt like it for more reasons that the ruleset was not balanced, but that is another history, the thing s that we played a ruleset that was tested by who? played by who and how many times ; my ruleset DO7 was played with alavet in first place, them with cid halsey, jeronimo and happyman, and i have to say that i recorded more than 30 videos and pics of the games played with that ppl, so then, after each rounds of games i did the balances better change some prices etc etc, THAT IS A TESTED RULESET/MOD...

and it is a tested mod because i did the job of contact alavet happyman, cid halsey and jeronimo (that he is my brother Tongue) to play it, i even tried to play with flak and darkmancer but they were busy but in the end with jeronimo, that is a good balancer, with cid  halsey that knows all about undead, happyman that knows all about greensking and alavet that is a good player and he cares about balancing a game.

How can you say that my ruleset isnt tested ? when ive been playing it for about half a year now with various players :O
More people tested New Balance than DO7... warhammerfreak, jeronimo, kura, abe, contrasnake, darkmancer? oh and a people that took part in january tournament.. sorry if i forgot about anyone

Moreover you might not know but i took point system (5k/15 - yeah i know Ramiro its totally unbalanced) as a base, and tried to make every regiment being an average of 2 points thus changes like mortart costing x2 its price, HoU x4 of its price etc.

Oh and wow 30 vids recorded Ramiro really? well i didnt recorded any of mine ;/ well maybe with Kura some time ago but i'll ask, you know what version 2.4 means ? well it means that it have been changed 24 times, and between each change there was couple of battles, lets say 4 its low number so i wont be accused of some unreal number. Do a math

Quote
and even just with looking at the wkurwiorny link about his mod it is demostrated that the june tournament was played with a no tested enough ruleset, and the cherry of this, is that the ruleset was played with a wrong votes count. any way.. in resume i say that it is posible to play tested and REALLY balanced rulesets/mods as it can desafortunatly be played not tested ruleset.

PD: i congraturat Wku because i have realised one thing. the name of his mod "NEW BALANCE 9k" make that ppl thinks it is a balanced mod, but no, it is just a good looking title.

When it comes to the voting, in the end i think we can say it was right ? As Cid didnt played any game so whitout his vote it would be 4 to 3.. or am i wrong ? And the name of the mod is more related to athletic footwear company than to some evil PR mind tricks that you are claiming.

Back to the mod

You act like there was some major unbalanced things in New Balance so tell me which one ? you got all furious that Horn cost 750gc just to realise you didnt copied engrel.exe to the right folder.. than you started to look for something else you could start crying over :| well tell me what was so overpowerd it made games one sided ? From what i know each race could defeat another, there wasnt spam armies or any "I win" regiments so tell me what was it ? maybe it was HoU ? no that cant be it

Ill go a little offtopic and ill ask about your DO7 ? Does UD always wins vs Greenskins just as when i played with you ? Im really curious but i cant check it out myself as you still didnt posted a link to your mod on this forum ;/ Oh you could post those vids when we playd, when i had UD i would really like to check it out

You seem to have some kind of quarrel with me that im not entirely sure of. Dont know, maybe its because i got a little bit diffrent view on balancing things, as i think that making changes after each game is pointless as you might not know in DO there is a lot of dice game. So if your regiment A clearly beats regiment B you are making changes instantly, and i wait couple of games to see does it really do so well and only then i would make any change to that unit..

Another thing is that i dont change unit stats so anyone who plays the game knows how each regiment will act in this mod, based on their expirience from campaign and default multiplayer, you know keeping it like it was meant to be

Btw Ramiro will you try to win voting this month ? or are you gonna wait on a month that ill be voting for mine ? Tongue
88  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: Tournament or Playtest field on: July 15, 2010, 07:48:19 AM
the problem with orginised playtests is this

http://forum.dark-omen.org/tournaments/new-balance-may-22-tourney-t744.0.html

other than that hunting for players during month on hamachi isnt cool, many people seems to be online but to get a responce is rather hard ;p
and just to say that after each tournament no matter what ruleset we are making changes even last 5k/15 i think there have been couple of changes, and it doesnt entirely means that ruleset is unbalanced but that it is improved to be even more better

in case of my mod i will make couple of changes but i think that even whitout them it is pretty balanced, its just some units like wraith arent worth their price and because of that less likely to be used in army, and i want every regiment to be useful and have its own place in armybuilt

cheers
89  Warhammer Dark Omen / Tournaments / Re: TOURNAMENT JUNE 2010 Version 2.0 on: July 14, 2010, 01:11:03 PM
If there are 3 Trolls/Ogres, 7 Mummies, 9 BGK, 14 Wights
Wraiths should be 5/5 in my opinion (best aprox inserted between 3 & 7). Odd Number Scale.

My suggestion for 5/5 Wraiths = 690gc >> Exactly like 14/14 glade polearm elfs. Anyone disagree? I dont Smiley

as of now i got them at 7/7 and 630
wraiths at 18/18 but im thinkig more of a 21/21 with no item slots
all lvl 2 units reduced from 1.5 of base price to 1.3
skeleton archers to 21/21 and 450->480
bone giant to 855

and about mages you guys thing they should be above 1k or below ?
90  Warhammer Dark Omen Community / Tavern / Re: Why it's hard to be a pro on: July 14, 2010, 01:05:30 PM
well now i fell like kicking your ass in chess Wink well im not the best player but i think i can handle you Smiley

www.kurnik.pl ? ^^
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 19